No. 87 (2021): Southern Archive (philological sciences)
Ukrainian language and literature

TROLLING IN UKRAINIAN-LANGUAGE MEDIA: LINGUISTIC ASPECT

Nataliia Igorivna Yelnikova
Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Published 2021-09-29

Keywords

  • Internet, Internet communication, deviant communication, trolling, Internet troll
  • Інтернет, інтернет-комунікація, девіантна комунікація, тролінг, інтернет-троль

Abstract

Goal. The aim of the study is a comprehensive analysis of a special type of speech behavior-trolling. The article characterizes the phenomenon of trolling as a kind of deviant communication. It is noted that trolling occurs as a reaction to changes in the functioning of media platforms. There are differences between trolling and flame, flood, spam, holivar, hating, cyberbullying. The linguistic means of trolling expression in the Ukrainian-language media space are analyzed.

Methods. To determine and describe the lexical-semantic structure of the studied trolling comments, the structural-contextual method was used; interpretive analysis made it possible to explain the meaning of the selected messages; contextual analysis helped to identify associative semantic features of textual comments; with the help of introspection it was possible to trace individual thoughts that arise during one’s own activity and are realized in the analysis of trolling comments.

Results. The result of the investigation was the definition of trolling as an integral part of virtual communication, which is identified by a combination of specific methods, tactics and strategies of the communicator’s behavior. It is established that the behavior of trolls can be manifested in two forms – “thick” (“malicious”) and “thin” trolling. Phenomena that are often identified with trolling are characterized, although they have significant differences: flame, flood, spam, holivar, hating, cyberbullying. Linguistic analysis of trolling in Ukrainian-language media through language means on phonetic, lexical-semantic, grammatical, syntactic levels is carried out.

Conclusions. During the study, it was found that one of the methods of detecting trolls in the Ukrainian-language media space is to establish emotional markers that are polarly opposite to most verbal units. Means of expressing the strategy of trolls can be traced at all language levels: at the lexical level it is possible to use pejorative vocabulary, in particular swear words, individual word formation, zoometaphors used with negative meaning. Graphic means of expression of trolling language are realized by reduplication of letters and punctuation marks.

References

1. Donath J. Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. London : Routledge. 1996. 246 р.
2. Внебрачных Р. А. Троллинг как форма социальной агрессии в виртуальных сообществах. Вестн. Удмурт. ун-та. Серия 3: Философия. Социология. Психология. Педагогика. 2012. Вып. 1. С. 48–51.
3. Дускаева Л., Коняева Ю. Троллинг в русскоязычных медиа. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 10: Журналистика. 2017. С. 84–100. URL: http://vestnik.journ.msu.ru/ books/2017/5/ (дата звернення: 26.08.21).
4. Ксенофонтова И. В. Специфика коммуникации в условиях анонимности: меметика, имиджборды, троллинг. Интернет и фольклор : сб. ст. Москва : Гос. республик. центр рус. фольклора, 2009. С. 285–294.
5. Лутовинова О. В. Языковая личность в виртуальном дискурсе : диссертация ... доктора филологических наук : 10.02.19. Волгоград, 2013. 437 с.
6. Лутовинова О. В. Жанровые характеристики холивара. Коммуникативные исследования. 2019. Т. 6. № 3. С. 696–711.
7. Михайлова О. Когда оскорбление воспринимается как шутка? Персональные и ситуативные факторы отключения моральной ответственности свидетеля кибербуллинга. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2019. Вып. 22 (2). С. 55–92. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kogda-oskorblenie-vosprinimaetsya-kak-shutkapersonalnye-i-situativnye-faktoryotklyucheniya-moralnoy-otvetstvennosti-svidetelya (дата звернення: 26.08.21).
8. Мозговая А. О. Провокационные стратегии троллинг и хейтинг в немецкоязычных интернет-текстах. Вестник МГЛУ. Гуманитарные науки. Вып. 2 (831) / 2020. С. 119–131.
9. Семенов Д. И., Шушарина Г. А. Сетевой троллинг как вид коммуникативной деятельности. Междунар. журн. эксперимент. образования. 2011. № 8. С. 135–136.
10. Синельникова Л. Н. Дискурс троллинга. Дискурс-Пи, Энциклопедия «Дискурсология». 2016. С. 271–279.