No. 83 (2020): Southern Archive (philological sciences)
Intercultural communication

DEMOTIVATORS AS A SPECIAL TYPE OF THE INTERNET DISCOURSE COMMUNICATION

Olha Oleksandrivna Zabolotska
Kherson State University
Oleksandra Volodymyrivna Zabolotska
Kherson State University

Published 2020-11-05

Keywords

  • iconic and verbal component, visual communication, functional and pragmatic potential
  • іконічний і вербальний компонент, візуальна комунікація, функціонально-прагматичний потенціал

Abstract

In the situation of computerization of modern society, the influence of the media on the way of life, the worldview and the consciousness of most people is evident. An attempt to overcome the language barrier of representatives of various linguistic cultures is playing a dominant role of nonverbal information in today’s global communication and the emergence of new visual and verbal forms of the Internet communication.

The purpose is to distinguish functional and pragmatic potential of demotivators in the Internet discourse.

Methods. In the course of the study, the following methods were used: a descriptive method, the method of semantic analysis, of stylistic analysis, of interpretive and textual analysis.

Demotivational posters are a special way of transmitting information, as prepositions are important for the fullest possible understanding of its meaning: the demotivator can contain such semantic components that do not find direct expression, and the reader decodes these meanings on the basis of their own experience, knowledge of typical situations, historical and cultural background and knowledge. The main function of demotivational posters is considered to be a cognitive one, as the information presented in demotivators can form the thinking of youth audience, its evaluative and normative system. Demotivators also realize volutative, axiological, aesthetic, emotional and expressive functions and the function of forming reality.

Results. The analysis of demo poster showed that the type of demotivators can determine their pragmatic potential: original, philosophical, social and advertising demotivators promote the main values and realize the volitional intention of the speaker, i.e. suggestive impact on the recipient that helps to create a spiritual guidance and a new type of thinking among young people; humorous and esoteric demotivators depict famous facts from youth’s life in an ironical and sarcastic manner, disclose social reality, have entertaining character, carrying out both emotional, expressive functions and a function of forming virtual reality.

Conclusions. Demotivational poster is a special way of transmitting information in the Internet discourse, which defines its moral and value orientations, the attitude towards the surrounding world.

References

1. Бацевич Ф.С. Основи комунікативної лінгвістики. Підручник. Київ : Академія, 2004. 344 с.
2. Бугаева И.В. Демотиваторы как новый жанр в Интернет-коммуникации жанровые признаки, функции, структура, стилистика. 2011. URL: http://www.rastko.rs/filologija/stil/2011/10Bugaeva.pdf (date of access: 10.08.2020).
3. Виноградова Т.Ю. Русская и сопоставительная филология: лингвокульторологический аспект. Казань, 2004. С. 63‒67.
4. Галичкина Е.Н. Специфика компьютерного дискурса на английском и русских языках (на материале жанра компьютерных конференций) : дис. … канд. филол. наук : 10.02.20 «Сравнительно-историческое, типологическое и сопоставительное языкознание». Астрахань, 2001. 212 с.
5. Голиков А.С., Калашникова А.А. Демотиваторы в Интернет-коммуникации: генезис, смысл, типология. Вестник Харьковского государственного университета. 2010. Вып. 16. С. 124‒130.
6. Загнітко А.П. Лінгвістика тексту: Теорія і практикум. Науково-навчальний посібник. Вид. 2-ге, доповнене і перероблене. Донецьк : ТОВ «Юго-Восток Лтд», 2007. 313 с.
7. Карасик В.И. О типах дискурса. Языковая личность: институциональный и персональный дискурс: сб. науч. тр. Волгоград : Перемена, 2000. С. 5‒20.
8. Лутовинова О.В. Демотиватор как вид сетевого творчества. Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание. 2016. Т. 15. № 3. С. 28‒36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.3.3 (date of access: 10.08.2020).
9. Макарук Л.Л. Проблеми дослідження семіотично ускладнених текстів. Науковий вісник Чернівецького університету: збірник наукових праць. 2014. С. 69‒72.
10. Шевченко І.С. Проблеми типології дискурсу. Дискурс як когнітивно-комунікативний феномен : кол. монографія / під заг. ред. Шевченко І.С. Харків : Константа, 2005. С. 233‒237.
11. Шейгал Е.И. Семиотическое пространство политического дискурса : дис. … докт. филол. наук : 10.02.19 / Волгоградский государственный университет. Волгоград, 2000. 440 с.
12. Bateman J. A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative. Journal of Pragmatics. 2014. № 74. P. 180‒208.
13. Cambridge Dictionary. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org (date of access: 10.08.2020).
14. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004. 272 p.
15. Crystal D. Text and discourse. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Second edition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1997. P. 116‒117.
16. Herring S.S. Computer-Mediated Discourse. URL: http://www.let.rug.nl/redeker/herring.pdf (date of access: 10.08.2020).
17. Kress G.R. Multimodal Discourse: the modes and the media of contemporary communication. London : Edward Arnold, 2002. 152 p.
18. Liebert W. Multimodal Text. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, 2013. P. 4338‒4336.
19. Veb-account “Facebook”. URL: https://uk-ua.facebook.com/ (date of access: 10.08.2020).
20. Veb-account “Instagram”. URL: https://www.instagram.com/?hl=ru (date of access: 10.08.2020).