No. 86 (2021): Southern Archive (philological sciences)
Romanic, Germanic and other languages

MOTIVATIONAL ASPECT OF FUNCTIONING OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN ENGLISH NEWS STORIES: A COGNITIVE RHETORICAL APPROACH

Tetiana Vitaliivna Mishchenko
Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University

Published 2021-06-29

Keywords

  • конструкція, когнітивна риторика, потреби, риторичні ефекти
  • construction, cognitive rhetoric, needs, rhetorical effects

Abstract

The aim of the suggested investigation lies in defining mechanisms of activating person’s basic needs with the help of PhUs in the news stories. To achieve the goal we have used the method of random sampling, linguo-cognitive and contextual-interpretational analysis.

The results of the research. A cognitive-rhetorical approach to studying functions of PhUs’ in news stories has revealed that they appeal to person’s basic needs: physiological, safety, belongingness, reputation and self-actualization. The effects of satisfying the needs or their deficit are created by PhUs due to their constructional basis resting on preconceptual sensorimotor structures.

PhUs produce the effect of the deficit of the physiological need in food relying on the relations of motion through many intermediate points. While the sense of satisfying the mentioned need is created by the PhUs based on ENABLEMENT, which also along with the COMPULSION image-schema creates the impression of self-actualization of participants represented as the source of the force activity. PhUs with the meaning of close distance and containment create the effect of inclusion into a family circle or a social group and the relations of exclusion conversely point that the belongingness need is not satisfied. Phraseological units trigger the feelings of safety being based on BLOCKAGE serving as a protection or safety deficit representing participants as the source of DISABLEMENT and COUNTERFORCE. PhUs appealing to the esteem need are based on STATUS VERTICALITY creating the effect of satisfying this need localizing event participants at the TOP and their DOWN position, i.e. their not reaching the top of the status hierarchy indicates the deficit of esteem.

Conclusions. Phraseological units are constructions, i.e. pairings of form, meaning and function, which rely on preconceptual sensorimotor structures – image-schemas. Localizing, space-motor and dynamic relations as the basis for PhUs as constructions allow us to explain the mechanisms of the effects of satisfying or the deficit of the basic human needs produced by the units under investigation.

References

1. Аристотель Риторика. Поэтика. Москва : Лабиринт, 2000. 224 с.
2. Безменова Н.А. Очерки по теории и истории риторики. Москва : Наука, 1991. 215 с.
3. Большой психологический словарь / под ред.: Б.Г. Мещерякова, В.П. Зинченко. Санкт-Петербург : ОЛМА-ПРЕСС, 2003. 672 с.
4. Володина М.Н. СМИ как форма общественного диалога. Язык современной публицистики. Москва : Флинта, Наука, 2007, С. 31–43.
5. Володина М.Н. Язык СМИ – основное средство воздействия на массовое сознание. Язык средств массовой информации : учебное пособие для вузов / под ред. М.Н. Володиной. Москва : Академический проект; Альма Матер, 2008. С. 5–23.
6. Демьянков В.З. Семиотика событийности в СМИ. Язык средств массовой информации : учебное пособие для вузов / под ред. М.Н. Володиной. Москва : Академический проект; Альма Матер, 2008. С. 71–85.
7. Міщенко Т.В. Когнітивно-риторичні функції фразеологізмів в англомовному журнальному дискурсі : дис. … канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04 / Ніжинський державний університет імені Миколи Гоголя. Ніжин, 2016. 262 с.
8. Набок А.І. Вербалізація ефектів об’єктивності та суб’єктивності в англомовному новинному інтернет-дискурсі: когнітивно-риторичний аспект : дис. … канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04 / Ніжинський державний університет імені Миколи Гоголя. Ніжин, 2017. 240 с.
9. Потапенко С. І. Сучасний англомовний медіа-дискурс: лінгвокогнітивний і мотиваційний аспекти : монографія. Ніжин : Видавництво НДУ імені Миколи Гоголя, 2009. 391 с.
10. Потапенко С. И. Медиапафос: не только эмоции. Лингвориторическая парадигма: теоретические и прикладные аспекты. 2017. № 22-1. С. 26–30.
11. Потапенко С.И. Медийная риторика: от устного к технологизированному воздействию. Лингвориторическая парадигма: теоретические и прикладные аспекты. 2018. № 23. С. 55–60.
12. Хазагеров Г.Г. Политическая риторика. Москва : Николло-Медиа, 2002. 313 с.
13. Goldberg A. E. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago ; L. : The University of Chicago Press, 1995. 265 p.
14. Goldberg A. E. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. N. Y. : Oxford University Press, 2006. 280 p.
15. Hoffman T. The renaissance of constructions: from constructions to construction grammars. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics / ed. Barbara Dancygier. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017. P. 284–309.
16. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago ; L. : The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987. 233 p.
17. Kwiatkowska A. From the editor Texts and Minds : Papers in Cognitive Poetics and Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main, etc. : Peter Lang, 2012. P. 7–10.
18. Leith S. You Talkin’ to me? Rhetoric from Aristotle to Obama. L. : Profile Books, 2011. 296 p.
19. Maslow A. Motivation and Personality. N.Y., etc. : Harper&Row Publishers, 1970. 368 p.
20. Oakley T. Force-dynamic dimensions of rhetorical effect. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. B. ; N.Y. : Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. P. 444–473.
21. Tabakowska E. Rhetoric: «the most valuable gift of gods» or «the art of deception»? Texts and Minds: Papers in Cognitive Poetics and Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main, etc. : Peter Lang, 2012. P. 273 – 286.
22. The Free Dictionary. URL : https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/ (дата звернення: 16.03.2021).