No. 83 (2020): Southern Archive (philological sciences)
Romanic, Germanic and Oriental languages

GENDER PECULIARITIES OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPLIMENTS AS TACTICS OF VERBAL MANIPULATION

Lina Yevheniivna Sorokina
Lesia Ukrainka Volyn National University

Published 2020-11-04

Keywords

  • strategies of positive politeness, strategies of negative politeness, self-presentation, gender identity, homogeneous group, heterogeneous group
  • стратегії позитивної ввічливості, стратегії негативної ввічливості, самопрезентація, гендерна приналеж- ність, гомогенна група, гетерогенна група

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study direct and indirect compliments as tactics of manipulative influence in English-speaking dialogical discourse.

The tactics are examined in the light of P. Brown and S. Levinson’s theory of positive and negative politeness. The basis of positive politeness is the verbal communication between individuals, united by mutual desire to preserve and strengthen social contact, while negative politeness is the basis of tactful behavior and mutual respect. The communicative nature of the compliment is complex and multifunctional.

Results. It has been revealed that direct and indirect compliment tactics effectively help to achieve manipulator’s goals by reducing the communicative distance and, accordingly, by creating a positive social face of the addressee. Direct compliment tactics are implemented in case of direct evaluation of the addressee, and therefore the means of expressing such evaluation are explicit. The indirect compliment tactic is implemented if the assessment does not relate directly to the addressee and is in the form of a question, prompting and / or comparison. It is proved that the meaningful and functional capacity of a compliment in the process of communication for manipulation purposes is not limited to the desire of being polite, establishing and maintaining contact. After all, stimulation of positive emotions through a compliment gives the manipulator access to the recipient's consciousness. Particular attention is given to the gender aspect. The implementation of complementary tactics for manipulation is considered in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Typical means and frequency of use of direct and indirect compliment tactics are studied, taking into account the communicators’ gender.

Conclusions. The analysis concludes that unlike men, women rarely use compliments for the purpose of manipulation. Female compliments are indirect or somewhat non-standard in both heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. Men, however, apply the original compliments only in heterogeneous groups in the social situation of flirting.

References

1. Василенко Н.В. Манипулятивный потенциал речевой тактики комплимента. Мовні і концептуальні картини світу. 2009. Вип. 26. Ч. 1. С. 148‒152.
2. Вострикова Е.С. Комплимент как одна из форм фатического общения : автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук : 10.02.04 «Германские языки». Санкт-Петербург, 2010. 17 c.
3. Галимова З.Ф. Тактики комплимента и похвалы в конструировании «положительного образа» женщины-собеседницы: на материале ток-шоу : дис. ... канд. филол. наук : 10.02.19. Ижевск, 2009. 168 с.
4. Гоффман И. Представление себя другим в повседневной жизни. Москва : КАНОН-пресс, 2000. 301 с.
5. Гриценко Е.С. Гендер в английской лингвокультуре. Нижний Новгород : Нижегородский гос. лингв. ун-т им. Н.А. Добролюбова, 2008. 214 с.
6. Дементьев В.В. Непрямая коммуникация. Москва : ГНОЗИС, 2006. 376 с.
7. Иссерс О.С. Коммуникативные стратегии и тактики русской речи. Москва : Едиториал УРСС, 2002. 284 с.
8. Ларина Т.В. Категория вежливости и стиль коммуникации : Сопоставление английских и русских лингво-культурных традиций. Москва : Языки славянских культур, 2009. 512 с.
9. Микитюк Ю.В. Комплімент як мовленнєвий акт (на матеріалі німецькомовних драматичних творів XVIII–XX ст.) : автореф. дис. ... канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04. Львів, 2017. 22 с.
10. Міщенко В.Я. Комплімент в мовленнєвій поведінці представників англомовних культур : автореф. дис. ... канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04. Харків, 2000. 23 с.
11. Шейгал Е.И. Игровой дискурс : игра как коммуникативное событие. Известия РАН. Серия литературы и языка. 2008. Т. 67, № 1. С. 3‒20.
12. Alderson M. How to Break Your Own Heart. L. : Penguin Books, 2009. 380 p.
13. Bagshawe L. Sparkles. L. : Headline, 2006. 599 p.
14. Brown P., Levinson S.C. Politeness : Some universals in language usage. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987. 345 p.
15. Desperate Housewives. 2007. Season 3. Episode 22.
16. Forrester H. The Latchkey Kid. L. : Harper Collins, 2009. 240 p.
17. Haugh M., Bargiela-Chiappini F. Face in Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42. P. 2073‒2077
18. Hiaasen C. Basket Case. N.Y. : Warner Books, 2002. 410p.
19. Holmes J. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Harlow : Pearson Education Limited, 2008. 504 p.
20. Jurčenko A. Politeness strategies in the interview with Michelle Obama. Odessa Linguistic Journal. 2019. Vol. 14. P. 37‒44.
21. Leech G. Politeness : Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research. 2007. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 167‒206.
22. Nowik E.K. Politeness of the Impolite : Relevance Theory, Politeness and Banter. Relevance Studies in Poland. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 157‒166.
23. Sheldon S. Memories of. L. : Harper Collins Publishers, 1994. 392 p.
24. Vincenzi P. Almost a Crime. L. : Orion, 2000. 627 p.