No. 81 (2020): Southern Archive (philological sciences)
Literary process: theoretical and historical aspects

J. ROLLINS’ AUTOREFLECTION AND CONSPIRACY NOVEL: ITERSECTION POINTS

Published 2020-07-08

Keywords

  • receptive-communicative approach, adventure tradition, thriller, detective, suspense
  • комунікативно-рецептивний підхід, авантюрно-пригодницька традиція, трилер, детектив, саспенс, література таємниці

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to trace J. Rollins’ self-reflection on the material of the writer’s mass media texts (interviews, reviews and responses to readers).

Methods. The complex methodology is used in the work. The main strategy is a receptive-communicative approach that performs interpretive functions. It is combined with comparative-historical, typological, structural-semantic methods of research.

Results. The conceptual analysis of J. Rollins’ mass media discourse is undertaken in the article. There are some aspects of the category “autoreflection” which are considered for its use as a working definition of the research; there are points of contact between the genre codifications of J. Rollins and the tradition of national literary criticism which are discovered to study the correlation of the “thriller” / conspiracy novel categories; J. Rollins’ self-identification is traced to the paradigm of American adventure literature, in particular in comparison with D. Brown's novels.

It is revealed that the work of J. Rollins continues the adventure tradition of the world literature – Jules Verne, Henry R. Haggard, Herbert G. Wells. In sync, the American writer distinguishes inter-literary communication with the «perfect trio»: Michael Crichton, Caleb Carr, and Dan Brown. J. Rollins’ remarks on the typological similarity of some of his works to D. Brown’s conspiracy novel is noted. There is a correlation between the understandings of the thriller in non-national literary terminology systems that is revealed and allows us to identify the genre structure of J. Rollins’ novel series “Sigma Force” as conspiracy novels.

Conclusions. In J. Rollins’ thrilling works, the conspiracy code is one of the genre-modeling. In this way, the adventurous and scientific discourses of his novels are synthesized with a conspiratorial narrative, structured by such constants: mystery – conspiracy – investigation. They are cross-cutting for such Sigma Force novels as Map of Bones (2005), The Doomsday Key (2009), Bloodline (2012), The Demon Crown (2017). The author creates a new type of the conspiracy novel containing its invariant, but differs in the way of solving artistic problems.

References

1. Амирян Т.Н. Конспирологический детектив как жанр постмодернистской литературы: Д. Браун, А. Ревазов, Ю. Кристева : дисс. канд... филол. наук : 10.01.03. Университет Российской академии образования. Москва, 2012. 329 с.
2. Амирян Т. Конспирологическая серия. Логос. 2014. № 5(101). С. 232–250.
3. Анцыферова О. Ю. Творчество Генри Джеймса: проблема литературной саморефлексии : автореф. дисс. … д. филол. н. : 10.01.03. Москва, 2002. URL : http://www.disserstation.ru/avtoreferats6/ir50.htm (дата звернення: 12.12.2019).
4. Бахтин М.М. Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. Собр. соч.: В 7 т. Москва : Русские словари: Языки славянской культуры, 2002. Т. 6. С. 7–300.
5. Кавелти Дж. Г. Изучение литературных формул. Новое литературное обозрение 1996. № 22. С. 33–64. URL : http://refdb.ru/look/1260355-pall.html (дата звернення: 07.06.2019).
6. Литературная энциклопедия терминов и понятий / под ред. А.Н. Николюкина. Институт научн. информации по общественным наукам РАН. Москва : НПК «Интелвак», 2003. 1600 стб.
7. Спиридонов Д.В. Рецептивные стратегии детективного повествования : типологический аспект. Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2012. № 20(274). Филология. Искусствоведение. Вып. 67. С. 118–124.
8. Штепенко О. Г. Література в дзеркалі літератури : стратегії художньої авторефлексіїї. Херсон : Айлант, 2017. 400 с.
9. Эко У. Открытое произведение : форма и неопределенность в современной поэтике / пер. с итал. А. Шурбелева. Санкт-Петербург : Symposium, 2006. 408 с. URL : https://libking.ru/books/sci-/sci-linguistic/216276-eko-umbertootkrytoe-proizvedenie.html (дата звернення: 15.09.2019).
10. Эко У. Роль читателя. Исследования по семиотике текста / перев. с англ. итал. С.Д. Серебряного. Санкт-Петербург : Симпозиум, 2005. 502 с.
11. Brooks P. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York : Knopf, 1984. P. XII. 363 р.
12. James Clemens’ official website. URL : www.jamesclemens.com (дата звернення: 11.03.2019).
13. Müller-Zettelman E. “A Frenzied Oscillation” Auto-Reflexivity in the Lyric / E. Müller-Zettelman ; [edi ted by Eva Müller-Zettelman and Margarete Rubik] Theory into Poetry : New Approaches to Poetry. Amsterdam. New York : Rodopi, 2005. P. 125–147.
14. The New York Times: book review. URL : https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/03/books/review/inside-the-list.html (дата звернення: 11.03.2019).
15. Todorov Tz. Poetique de la prose (choix) suivi de Nouvelles recherches sur le rccit (1971, 1978). URL : http://www.ae-lib.org.ua/texts/todorov__poetique_de_la_prose__fr.htm (дата звернення: 01.03.2020).
16. Jauss H. R. The Theory of Reception: A Retrospective of its Unrecognized Prehistory. Literary Theory Today / ed. by Peter Collier and Helga Geyer-Ryan. Cambridge, 1990 P. 53–72.