No. 77 (2019): Southern Archive (philological sciences)
Literary process: theoretical and historical aspects

FEATURES OF THE LITERATURE OF ENGLISH NEOROMANTICISM: TRANSITION IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN LITERARY CRITICISM

Published 2019-04-01

Keywords

  • transition theory,
  • neo-romanticism,
  • modernism,
  • transit-culture
  • теорія перехідності,
  • неоромантизм,
  • модернізм,
  • культура перехідності

Abstract

The article presents the views of contemporary foreign literary researchers to the analysis of the literary discourse of representatives of English neo-romanticism J. Conrad, R. Kipling, R.L. Stevenson, who are considering these writers from a new angle. The scientific relevance of the problem of transition is due to the need to understand this period both in macrodynamics of culture, and in literary criticism in particular.
The theoretical substantiation of the problem is given, the artistic concept of neo-romanticism is outlined. The purpose of the article is to study the peculiarities of modern literary and critical perception of the artistic concept of English neoromantics as a phenomena of the transition literature. The object of the study is the development of the critical literary thought in the study of English neo-romanticism at the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. The subject of the study is the concept of “transition” in the context of the changing paradigms of scientific thinking.
Considering the literary heritage of English neo-romantics R. Kipling, J. Conrad, R. L. Stevenson, it can be stated that modern foreign literary scholars note the fact that these writers have radically changed the artistic and aesthetic tradition of the XIX century. It is concluded that the transience of the literary works of the English neo-romantics is evidenced by the critical researches of a number of foreign scholars, highlighting the new quality of historical and literary phenomena, indicating their notable features, which point to a peculiarity against the background of other literary and stylistic trends, manifested primarily in the genre system, the configuration of characters, paradoxes and contrasts, passion for a grotesque, etc. Thus in English-language critical literary studies a reassessment of the creative heritage of these writers can be traced. The prospect of the study may be to focus on the study of aesthetic ideas from the point of view of psychology in the literature of the transition period, which is important for reading modern literature.

References

1. Борев Ю. Литература и литературная теория ХХ в. Перспективы нового столетия. Теоретико-литературные итоги ХХ века : в 2 т. Москва : Наука, 2003. Т. 1 : Литературное произведение и художественный процесс. С. 6–48.
2. Зарубежная литература конца ХIX – начала ХХ века / под ред. В.М. Толмачева. Москва : Академия, 2003. 493 с.
3. Зотова Л.И., Дусина Н.В. Малая проза Р. Киплинга в контексте английской литературы рубежа XIX – XX вв.: специфика индивидуально-творческой манеры. Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики : в 2 ч. Тамбов : Грамота, 2017. Ч. 1. № 1(67). C. 24–27.
4. Каган М.С. К проблеме переходного типа культуры. Системный подход и гуманитарное знание: избранные статьи. Ленинград : Изд-во Ленинградского ун-та, 1991. С. 78–181.
5. Кривцун О.А. Художественные эпохи в культуре Нового времени: проблемы идентификации. Искусствознание. 2001. № 1. С. 17–39.
6. Лейдерман Н. Траектории «экспериментирующей эпохи». Вопросы литературы. 2002. № 4. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/voplit/2002/4/lei.html (дата звернення: 18.11.2018).
7. Луков В.А. Неоромантизм. Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2012. № 2. С. 309–312.
8. Луков В.А. Неоромантизм: термин в тезаурусном ключе. Тезаурусный анализ мировой культуры : сб. науч. трудов / ред. В.А. Луков. Вып. 19. Москва : Изд-во МГУ, 2009. С. 60–64.
9. Мережинская А.Ю. Художественная парадигма переходной культурной эпохи. Русская проза 80–90-х годов ХХ века : монография. Киев : ИПЦ «Киевский университет», 2001. 433 с.
10. Силантьєва В.I. Художнє мислення перехідного часу (література та живопис): А.П. Чехов, I. Левітан, В. Серов, К. Коровін. Одеса : Астро-принт, 2000. 352 с.
11. Силантьева В.И. Традиция в перспективе переходного времени. Уральский филологический вестник. Серия «Русская литература XX – XXI веков: направления и течения». 2016. № 3. С. 67–80.
12. Силантьева В.И. Теория переходности: традиционный литературоведческий и синергетический подходы. Вісник Дніпропетровського університету імені Альфреда Нобеля. Серія «Філологічні науки». 2014. № 2(8). С. 31–41.
13. Толмачев В.М. Неоромантизм. Литературная энциклопедия терминов и понятий / отв. ред. А.Н. Николюкин. Москва : Интелвак, 2001. С. 640–646.
14. Яковлева Т.А. Культура и культурология в хронотопе переходности : автореф. дисс. … канд. культурологии : 24.00.01. Челябинск, 2004. 22 c.
15. Arata S. Realism. The Cambridge Companion to the Fin de Siècle / еd. G. Marshall. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 169–188.
16. Artese B. Testimony on Trial: Conrad, James, and the Contest of Modernism. Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2012. 206 p.
17. Brodsky G.W.S. Joseph Conrad’s Polish Soul: Realms of Memory and Self. Lublin : Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press, 2016. 416 р.
18. Can T. (De) forming the Modernist Canon: Joseph Conrad and English Literary Modernism. Stuttgart : Wisa, 2014. 132 p.
19. De Capitani L. The playwright, the moralist and the poet: a Brechtian reading of Stevensonʼs writings on François Villon. Journal of Stevenson Studies. 2015. Vol. 12. P. 53–79.
20. Dury R. Reading Forest Notes. Journal of Stevenson Studies. 2016. Vol. 13. P. 31–34.
21. Dryden L., Dury R., Watson R. Editorial. Journal of Stevenson Studies. 2009. Vol. 6. P. 1–3.
22. Graham K. Indirections of the Novel: James, Conrad, and Forster. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 2009. 227 р.
23. Hirsch G. The rejection of dichotomous thinking in Stevenson’s literary essays. Journal of Stevenson Studies. 2009. Vol. 6. P. 81–96.
24. Kačāne I. The basic categories of neo-romanticism in the 19th century British literature. Yerevan Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 115–127. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326541046 (дата звернення: 22.11.2018).
25. Kent K.S. Rudyard Kipling’s Literary and Historical Legacy. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse. 2013. Vol. 5(11). P. 1–3.
26. Krajka W. Joseph Conrad’s Authorial Self: Polish and Other. Lublin : Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press, 2018. 402 р.
27. Joseph Conrad: Between Literary Techniques and Their Messages / by W. Krajka. New York : East European Monographs, 2009. 287 р.
28. Liu D. A Structuralist Analysis of Conradian Narrative in The Nigger of the “Narcissus”. Studies in Literature and Language. 2011. Vol. 3(3). P. 72–78.
29. Norquay G. Robert Louis Stevenson and Stanley J. Weyman: Reviving Romancers or Aging Adventurers. English Literature in Transition. 2012. Vol. 55. P. 176–194.
30. Palmer J.A. Joseph Conrad’s Fiction: A Study in Literary Growth. New York : Ithaca Univ. Press, 1968. 267 р.
31. Peters J.G. The Cambridge Introduction to J. Conrad. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2006. 158 p.
32. Reid J. Robert Louis Stevenson, Science, and the Fin de Siècle. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. 240 p.
33. Robert Louis Stevenson and Joseph Conrad: Writers of Transition / eds. : L. Dryden, S. Arata, E. Massie. Lubbock : Texas Tech University Press, 2009. 288 p.
34. Sandison A. Masters of the Hovering Life: Robert Musil and R.L. Stevenson. Robert Louis Stevenson. Writer of Boundaries / eds. : R. Ambrosini, R. Dury. Madison, WI : University of Wisconsin Press, 2006. P. 315–226.
35. Sandison A. Robert Louis Stevenson and the Appearance of Modernism. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 1996. 423 p.
36. Sanders A. Late Victorian and Edwardian Literature, 1880–1920. The Short Oxford History of English Literature. 3rd ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 465–513.
37. Simmons D. The Narcissism of Empire: Loss, Rage and Revenge in Thomas De Quincey, Robert Louis Stevenson, Arthur Conan Doyle, Rudyard Kipling and Isak Dinesen. Brighton ; Portland : Sussex Academic Press, 2007. 148 р.
38. Stape J.H. The New Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015. 280 p.